Monday, December 08, 2008

Free money is scary


How often does the government give you something? Free? Today, we got two $40 off coupons from the US Treasury towards the purchase of some converter boxes. Now, I know I am a little paranoid by nature. But, really, when does the government ever give anything away? Doesn't it make you just wonder a little?

Monday, December 01, 2008

Reading the Bible in a year



Sounds easy right? I've found it to be anything but. Miss a day here, miss a day there, suddenly, it's a drought of Scripture. So, on my quest to find a good calender, I found these schedules to help. (These are long, so, skip ahead.)

Straightfoward, read a bit each day

52 Week Bible Reading Plan

Sunday, November 30, 2008

It is a sad testimony that this is national news:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,459247,00.html

Saturday, November 29, 2008

To the few...

Something for the ball of curiosity in all of us to bounce around.

http://www.ted.com/

Thanks Doc Easson.

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Marketing free Jesus - Part 2


Okay, I was hasty this morning. I didn't have time to actually write what caught my mind's ear. When I read the gospels I don't think that Jesus needed something to get people's attention. People knew Jesus was different just by being around him. I have heard for years people say in various ways, that if you have to let people know something about you, it's probably not true. For instance, if you have to remind people you're really tall, lest they forget, you're either: 1) not very tall or 2) in constant need of feeling recognized for being tall. A soft example, no doubt. But, the point remains the same: Jesus didn't need to advertise, it was unmistakable who and what he was. That is what I am hoping to become. I don't want to have to remind people, "Oh yeah, by the way, in case you didn't know, I'm a Christian." As Francis of Assisi is rumored to have said, "Proclaim the gospel; use words if you must."

Jesus without the marketing


Lately I've been feeling a bit of regret as I see churches with huge budgets, gigantic facilities, amazing radio programs... In other words the works. Would Jesus have ever considered using a marketing strategy to reach new Christians? Eternal life is not something that works well with worldly schemes and mechanisms and I feel remorse over being a part of a religious life that thinks this works. I am not trying to say I have some great insight into what is authentic and what isn't, but, the idea of Jesus using the "strategies" Christians focus on today just makes my stomach turn. I guess I want people to stop spending time trying to figure out how to be the most effective Christian with their resources and just love the world back to life. Who cares if it's pretty or not.

Sunday, September 07, 2008

Spiritual ecologist


Many years ago, in an experience I will relate another time, I was told to meditate on the term "spiritual ecologist". At the time, I stumbled onto a book by Ken Wilber titled, "Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution". I remembered reading it as more of a collection of unfocused, rambling thoughts of a man who clearly had insights, but, no cohesive vision to tie them together. Nonetheless, I still was excited to have something to confirm the term had some real world connection. I did a quick Google search and saw 140 hits for this specific term as of today. Seems like someone wants me to look back at the concept again.

Just because I am leery of people playing with gigantic, multi-million dollar toys


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1053091/Meet-Evans-Atom-end-world-Wednesday.html

Why does government allow scientists to spend 1/2 billion dollars on technology like this? Why can't people get fed, hospitals get built, debts be abolished? On top of that, these old cooks could possibly do something and people not even realize the warnings were portending some flavor of truth.

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Things that make you go, hmmmm...then, Hallelujah


Sometime in our afternoon ramblings Page stopped me to tell me "a prophet is someone who listens to God and tells people what He says." I thought, wow, that's a pretty precise way to put it. They must have been talking about prophets at Sunday school today, but, it makes me recall something I've been meaning to note for a while now.

A few weeks ago at work I ran into someone I was helping with a curious comment. She got off the phone with one of her daughters and proceeded to comment about the eldest daughter calling in frustration because the younger daughter won't run the vacuum cleaner because she hears voices. My ears immediately perked up at this. The woman dismissed it rather easily. I had meant to go back to talk to her about it but never got a moment. While waiting for my break, I debated about whether I should or shouldn't.

The following Saturday, Page, Kerri and Emma went to Whole Foods. While there Kerri, the super shopper she is, managed to find some all-natural soap either free or surprisingly cheap. After coming home, Page came into my bathroom and proceeded to tell me the soap was singing. Now, I don't know what's weirder, the immediate reaction a normal person would have to this kind of remark or the fact that I didn't even hesitate to ask her about the song. I don't think of my responsiveness as a good or bad thing, just something that makes me different...and my family.

Being that they had gotten the soap at Whole Foods, I pretty much intuited the possibility of a wiccan or witch-based business that curses its products. For me, the gap between all-natural and nature-worship it not that big in some cases. At any rate, I started dialoging with her about it:

Me: "Was it a good song or a bad song?"
Page: "A bad song. It was a man who sounded like a woman."
Me: "You know, God sometimes lets us know things to help us learn about what he wants. Right now, I think God is letting you know this about the soap so you can learn to ask him what he wants you to do at times like this."
Page: "Oh, ok."
Me: "So, if the soap is singing a bad song, what do you think God wants you to do?"
Page: "Throw it away."
Me: "That sounds like a good choice. Go ahead and throw it away."
Page: "Ok."

I don't know if I am justified in feeling this way, but, I can relate to the line in Luke 2:19, "But Mary kept all these things in her mind, pondering them in her heart." I am not inferring my daughter is Jesus or anything along those lines, but, rather, seeing things unfold in my daughter's life that point in interesting directions. Praise God he has entrusted our family with such an awesome path before us. Please protect us as well Holy Spirit that Jesus may be the light in our lives!

Sunday, August 24, 2008

The past couple of years environmentalism has been a rallying point of so many debates it's become an ignored drone in the background for most people. That is, until this summer when prices for gas skyrocketed. So, now that everyone's pocket books are getting pinched, lots of folks want to talk about it. For years, people who have been crusading for the cause feel vindicated, as if we have a major wake up call and times will change. I am admittedly a little cynical. First of all, I think people need to walk, ride their bikes, sell their car, carpool and get over their obsession with being able to do what they want when they want. In this country, we are lazy and obsessed with having too much per individual.

On top of that, though, I have a bigger issue with part of the environmentalist agenda. Now, I wholly believe and recognize there are people out there who make personal sacrifices and truly live according to the laws of conservation so blindly ignored in the US. But, I also believe there are many who are not being environmentalists because of the repercussions of ignoring this movement, but, rather, because of a larger spiritual movement: nature worship.

In Greek mythology, Gaia was thought to be the spirit of the earth, or the goddess of the earth. Even today there are small groups who espouse nature worship, though, they would hardly admit it as such. In their minds, destroying the environment is killing this goddess. To them, the earth is alive, it possesses spirit and our actions are harmful to this goddess and must be stopped.

Though I doubt many environmentalists would even accept such a claim, let's look at the idea of what we are trying to protect with the movement. The crust of the earth covers the first 35 kilometers of depth as you approach its core. The other 6,343 kilometers are various forms of molten rock and liquid matter. So, aside from the fact that people can't live beneath the surface of the earth, we are only looking at 0.5% of the earth's radius as being affected by our destructive trends. Comparing this to the human body, it's about 1/4 the thickness of the skin on your fingertip relative to the thickness of your finger. So, we know it's not the earth as a whole.

Okay, let's relegate our review to the surface of the earth. There are so many elements that we take into consideration: air, water, land, trees, animals. Pretty much everything that we as humans are in contact with. These things are being polluted and the end result is the environment, that is, everything that sustains life, is being destroyed. Rising water levels don't matter because the water is rising. Rising water levels matter because it is changing the ecosystem. We, the theory goes, are losing precious, rare life because of this.

So, life, not the earth, is the real focus here. I guess as we get closer to ourselves the focus shrinks. Originally, "saving the earth" was the motto of the environmentalists. Now, it's "saw the parts of the earth that affect us and the things we think of that make us realize the ills of our ways". Hmmm, so, environmentalism may have once had the aire of sprituality, nature worship, but, it's a way of looking at the world around us and using it as evidence for the ills of our political and sociological ways.

I guess it really ties into the notion that the American democratic emphasis is on that of ideals, where as republican emphases are on humanity. When it comes down to it, in many realms, ideas prevail in the democratic mind, whereas in the republican mindset, people win over all else. Let's look at abortion. Democrats value freedom; republicans value human life. While both are necessary, neither one, alone, is solely right. Without freedom, human life is really no life at all. Without life, freedom is meaningless. That's just one example. I'm sure it'd be very easy to point out a contradiction to this, but, I think it does illustrate that ideals matter more often than not to some and I believe that environmentalism is often more of an ideological than a humanitarian focus.

Saturday, August 23, 2008

I have my most amazing revelations in four places: driving to work, running, cleaning dishes and either sleeping or just about to fall asleep. Tonight, it was cleaning dishes. As I stood there, a random thought passed through my mind. Being random, however, didn't rob it of being a powerful insight. Many times, when I deliberately sin, knowing full well I am doing wrong, I find myself feeling good at that moment. By that I mean, I am not aware of guilt, consequences, emotions, thoughts, the future or the past. It's like I am outside of time for a moment. This realization points to why I go there. It is a way to find ecstasy, a place outside of myself, where who I normally am is washed away temporarily. That has a great allure. It is pure escapism. The hook of sin is that everything comes back. Sin normally is a short-lived hit of numbing agent, the sting of which is greater than the pain it is meant to numb. To me, it's funny that many people are addicted to drugs, but, the same mechanism can occur with anything. I guess for me, sin is my escape. My hiding place from goodness. I think at the same time, that sense of guilt, connected, pain, that is God helping me to be in touch with others, Him, the challenges of reality as a Christian. I can only imagine what Christ saw when he looked out over the world, a place full of sick, ailing souls. From the sanitarium...getting better every day. By God's grace.

Sunday, August 17, 2008

I haven't run this through the scriptures, but, there's this unsettling feeling I have about people who work for "the Kingdom". Many times I've met people who are doing "great things", following some dream and doing great work for the "Kingdom of God". Yet, along the way, there is little in the way of built up churches, lives affected in a way I think Christ would commend, and, rarely, long-lasting relationships. Looking as Scripture, from memory at least, Paul would spend years in a place. He would build churches. I strongly suspect his legacy was one built on the backs of the time he spent with people, hearing their stories, telling them about his, and, introducing Jesus to them. The Kingdom was advanced. People came first though. That is the rub I have. I sense the people I have in mind are ones who are achievement and results oriented, concerned more with being super-Christians, much like Paul referred to in Corinthians, than having a super heart for God. I guess I would trade all the gifts in the world for a life more full of love and the fruit of the spirit. Now, I don't pretend I would not like to have a life that more closely resembled the poster-child of the 1st century apostles. However, if I am not that way, I do not try harder. I pray to be closer to God and have others closer to Him because of my longing to be nearer Him. Lord, help me to build your church more, love others more completely and lose my concern for results within my rapture for you.
All right, confession time. A few years ago, while we lived in Baton Rouge, pastor Pete-our lead pastor-did something interesting. He told everyone that we believed in the five fold gifts, as outline in Ephesians 4. He had placed small pieces of paper in a bucket with the names of the gifts written on them. If anyone felt led, he said, come up and get a piece of paper. Around this time I had discovered Streams ministries and the prophetic arena, dreams, and all that jazz. So, I wanted to be a prophet. Lo and behold, I grabbed a piece of paper labeled 'teacher'. I was disappointed. And, of course, everyone said, "Duh, did you really think it would be anything else?" I didn't really like that. Here we are 4 or 5 years later and I am publicly confessing I am humbly accepting my call as a teacher. (I wonder, in the back of my mind, if it is public if I have no readership and rarely if ever actually meet anyone who reads this. But, I digress.) I wish I could say it was with humility and graceful joy, but, it's really more with mumbling and grumpy reluctance.

So, as a matter of accountability, I have to admit, I have much writing to catch up on. At least 20 blog posts I have saved as drafts because the ideas are rough, at very best and, quite frankly, I am a procrastinator. To keep me honest, if you read this with any regularity, send me an email and post every now and again asking about the following three books I am supposed to work on:

1) Ephesians 6
2) several words, such as perfection, chance and love, that I have discovered the Biblical meanings of which revitalized my understanding of things
3) the role of teacher in the Bible

If I haven't written any of these in the next couple of years, goad me with an email or note.

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

I heard about this and laughed and cried all at the same time.

nicecritic.com

We can't even confront each other directly any more. We are truly a disconnected society!

Cessationism. Again



Ok, I know I've talked about this before, but, another thought came to mind regarding the issue of prophecy ceasing at the end of the first century. In Revelation 19:10, John writes, "I am a fellow servant with you and with your brothers who hold to the testimony of Jesus. Worship God!. For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." I do not presume to know the full meaning of what the angel was saying to John, but, the last line, "the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy" jumps out to me. It has for years.

Cessationists hold that prophecy no longer has a place in today's church. If prophecy is not to be in today's church, what does this mean for the testimony of Jesus? One immediate counter I considered is that they would say, "the spirit of prophecy" and the act of prophecy are two different things. Even if that is the case and I am simply misreading John's intended meaning here, I still wonder where was he going with this?

Playing cessationist's advocate... I assume that prophecy no longer has a place in the church today. Say all foretelling of events has fully occurred. No more future events are to be predicted. That doesn't prevent forthtelling, that is to say, declarative proclamation of God's kingdom, from occurring. That too is a key function of prophetic ministry.

Ultimately, it boils down to what the phrase "spirit of prophecy" means. The testimony of Jesus is fairly straight forward. This is the gospel, the spreading of the good news. So, we have a simple relationship, an equality put forth. (Yes, I put this in math terms to simplify it for myself.)

Testimony of Jesus = spirit of prophecy

In my heart I think testimony, that is, confirming statement of belief. For instance, a witness' testimony in a court of law. The left side of the equation seems to refer to witness' expression/expressing of Jesus' impact on their lives. (The / joining the two words indicates it's not just a noun (expression) or a verb (expression) but rather both that I aim to touch on here.) In other words, people testifying about Jesus. Testifying would most like result in preaching, teaching and spreading the good news. Living the life Jesus commanded his followers to live.

Ok, I think have a general grip on that side of things. Now, the spirit of prophecy suggests something, to me at least, about intimacy, or innermost being. Spirit, as I see it here, refers to the very core or essence of a thing. Prophecy as a whole can have many aspects. However, the spirit of prophecy, that phrase, points to a specific element of prophecy, it's very nature. Looking more closely, when prophecy, more precisely, the spirit or essence of prophecy, is boiled down to its essence-if my equation approach holds water-really just is a matter of people proclaiming the good news of Christ.

So, then, if what I have laid out here is accurate and the very essence of prophecy is living an outspoken, declarative, active life to share the testimony of Jesus...I cannot see how anyone can argue against prophecy in the modern church! Without prophecy, if this is accurate, Christ would not be in the church. We would not have a confirming act and history. I know this is a non-traditional argument against cessationism, but, it is clear and obvious to me, looking at it this way, there is something being ignored by those who hold to the position itself.

Death to self



I think most people who have gone to church any significant amount of time have run across a sermon, or, if they read the Bible on their own, the verses, where Jesus predicts his death. Below is the passage from Mark 8 with verses in line.

31He then began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and after three days rise again. 32He spoke plainly about this, and Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him.
33But when Jesus turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter. "Get behind me, Satan!" he said. "You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."
34Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. 35For whoever wants to save his life[c] will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. 36What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? 37Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? 38If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's glory with the holy angels."


Long running arguments about the nature of this verse--is it literal or metaphorical--are not the road I want to take today, but, I know those are intriguing concepts.

I am looking more at the issue of self-denial and trying to make sense of how that really works. I assume, based on the fundamental belief Jesus suggested the disciples do it, that is can be done. Of course, on the easy stuff, things which are not major, deep rooted issues, this is doable. I can get that. However, when you get to issues that you cannot walk away from no matter what you do, no matter how badly you want or how much it hurts. Then, we are talking about a different story.

To try and put this type of matter to a head, I was shown the idea of looking at death to self literally. Death is a matter of finality, of permanence. Insofaras death means an end. When people die, in most cases, they do not come back to life. The end is full and complete. With regards to self-denial (or the "death of self") I don't see this sense of death. Rather, it's more of a comatose state...it can wake up at any time and after a little free-for-all, go back to its zombie mode.

I long for the presence of God so powerful that sin can be put to death. My intial hope here is the supernatural "you're freed once and for all" kind of release. However, I think most have to struggle, thought-to-thought, moment-to-moment for that overcoming. Doing this over and over and over, submitting one's self to Christ, focusing on him, instead of the object of wrath, the sinful thing, over and over and over will transform character. And, that, the transformation of character, the supernatural metamorphosis of self that occurs under God's loving hand, that is the kind of death I seek. A sublimation of eternal proportions. I seek permenance, but, recognize that God's way is one that allows us to die and yet live through the process of death and denial.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Angels, angels everywhere?


I think one of the reasons I like to think of the self as that over-arching sense of the patterns which form our sense of continuous existence points me to the luxuary factor. It's so easy to just let things be the way they are. Change, however, is not quite so easy. It often forces us to question things we faced, answered and put to bed. Of course, some of these life questions come more often than others. Now, what in the world does this have to do with my post? Only a little, but, I see the patterns of what we expect to be as forming a lot of our mindless behaviour. If we choose to actively ignore, that is to say, not question, our ways, we can mosey along quite contentedly without reason for looking back. Then, as Murphy's law would have it, things sometimes force us to turn around.

So, the point of all this: angels. While in the ER recently, I saw Perry Stone. Mannafest? Anyone ever hear of it? Kerri and I used to watch it all the time in Baton Rouge. Now that we are all metropolitan-that's economically challenged, if your pronounce it phonetically-and live in Dallas, we don't have high falutin thing like cable, so, that's out. Anyhow, something about the show made me think of angels. I literally walk around all day, particularly when I am somewhere outside my normal course of events and pattern of affairs, wondering, is the next person I meet going to be an angel? Perry Stone was talking about fallen angels (no my topic), and, in the teaching he said that angels can take the form of men. Now, many Christians might instantly scoff at this. Some might say, oh yeah, I think I remember something like that. Others are already on the same page. Yeah, I wonder, how many other people really walk around with this kind of mentality, really wondering, is the person I'm talking to a person or the Lord or a demon? Perhaps it sounds crazy, but, biblically speaking, this is a sound way to look at life. Does anyone else wonder about the folks their speaking with, or am I all alone here?

Spiritual amoeba


Last Sunday our pastor preached his last sermon of a series from the psalms. For some reason, I got sidetracked and started getting into Jeremiah 14:23. Well, there is no Jeremiah 14:23. So, I read Jeremiah 14:2-3. It didn't really strike me as anything particular. I know for myself, I have found that a particular verse, when given to me with a little nudge, typically means I should keep reading. In this case I did. I felt that so much of what was said in this spoke to our country right now. I also wondered if it spoke to where we are at or where we are going as a nation.

This reminded me of a vision I had several years ago. While praying with a prayer group, I saw an image of an amoeba approaching the United States and then slowly absorbing it. I didn't see much more than this, but, that was enough. At first, I didn't know what to think of it or how to pray about it. I asked Barbie about it at the next Streams class I got a chance to go to (the 202) and she said to pray the opposite, to pray blessing. Fast forward several years and I see a country in the tubes. I just wonder how we are going to get freed of this oppressive, life-sucking spirit. Blessing, repentence, national leadership, coverage, prayer, prayer, prayer.

Dreams and visions


During my Streams classes I recall hearing about the difference between dreams and visions. For some reason, it came to mind again today. The one thing that came to mind, and I don't think this is textbook Streams, just a thought of my own: visions frequently show events in the past, present or future that the recipient would have had no way to actually experience themselves. The difference here is that the events, in this case, are real events. Understanding visions requires little interpretation. (Of course, that's not to say it doesn't ever require interpretation. That would be totally unbiblical.) Dreams, however, as Joel infers, are something for people advanced in spiritual maturity levels. At least that's my reading of the phrase "old men". Anyhow, I was thinking about it because I get more dreams than visions. No, this isn't to say that I have either of them often, but, dreams seem to come more than visions. I just wonder what this means? I know people who are seers more than dreamers. Just an intriguing question I got while using a razor blade to saw into my sheetrock this afternoon.
While driving home tonight I heard a radio spot talking about the typical role of evangelism in Christianity. The illustrator went on to talk over the sounds of a seventh grade symphony playing Beethoven. The comparison was pretty obvious as to where it was going, but, it made sense. People often misjudge Christ based on the fact that they see his followers and think, "If this is how people who follow Christ act, why would I do it?" The spot went on to say that it would be impossible to know Beethoven was a genius based on the performance of an unskilled, imperfect actor. Likewise, watching Christians would make it impossible for anyone to truly appreciate Christ's gloriousness. Christ calls people to know him, not his followers. It was a good analogy. I think the commercial was over the top, but, I really like the point and will hopefully get to use it sometime...at least some time other than here.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

I've heard the argument that people put up, "God gave me a brain, it'd be a sin not to use it." This is a rationalization for soulish behavior that justifies the belief that intellect (one third of the soul) has greater power than the spirit. This argument drives me nuts. People act in such pride and harsh ways with this belief is scares me. The same argument gives people the mentality that they can base their acceptance of God on whether they get God or not. The way this appears is that people refuse to accept certain tenets of faith based on whether it is understandable to them or not. God isn't a respecter of man. Why should he be a respecter of man's logic? Our minds are gifts from God, parts of our being which are to be used to glorify him. Using our minds to do things which defy God's laws and spirit is contrary to God's intent. This kind of ties in with my older post on the nature of love and giftedness. I really am seeing, though I think it's certainly not the main way Paul intended for this relationship to be considered, that our concepts of how gifts are meant to be used by the body of Christ differs greatly with what worldly, selfish purposes will have us do.

God and sense


During some of the Streams classes a while back I remember them talking about how to restrain your spirit. Often times proptetic people will have three types of temptations, the three G's: 1) guys/girls 2) gold and 3) glory. Folks with the guys/girls temptation will be guilty of reading people's mail and gaining unpermitted knowledge or pleasure from using their spirit on others. As I thought about this I considered that, in this culture, in this worldly culture, touching is taboo, but, looking is okay. To me, as a follower of Christ, I don't necessarily see why this works, based on the Bible.

I recall a dialog Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves had in the Devil's Advocate that went like this, "Look but don't touch. Touch, but don't taste. Taste, don't swallow." Now, in context, this was a pretty dangerous dialog, but, I think it so perfectly embodied what I am trying to point out I had to use it. If you accept one of these things, then, the next is so easy to justify, so, slippery a slope it is. And, that's the whole danger, one thing so easily leads to another.

In our over-sexed culture, people, both young and old, are constantly exposed to the visual bombardment of flesh and lust. There is a constant paradox. We are told to neither look nor touch, but, we are constantly in an environment where our eyes are given basically no choice but to see. So, here we have one sense, sight, that is forced to be exposed to horrible things and another, touch, that is supposed to be held sacred. It's such a paradox. Why is it okay for one sense to be immersed in lustful forces, and, another which is not?

Biblically, it's not. Culturally, they are permissive, so, who cares?...as the logic would go. Job made a covenant with his eyes to stare on no young women. Christ said even thinking lustfully is sinful. With these kind of examples, I have to contend with our culture: it's not okay to make such an arbitrary distinction. No one sense is any more "permitted" to be emersed in lustful forces than any other. Heck, our world suggests empiricism, as the most basic form of logic by which to test things, relies solely on the senses. If we rest solely on the senses, all we know of the world comes through what see, feel, taste, etc. So, again, using such a simplistic view of the world, why allow one sense to be okay with sin, but, not others?

The whole thrust of this post was to point out that sight is really no different from touch when it comes to immorality and abusing spiritual gifts. Whether we "touch" or "look" lustfully on another, it's still lust. The effects are still the same on the spirit. Our age needs to know that our spirit is not restricted to these "boundaries" the world deems as being okay. Likewise, how our spirit behaves must operate by God's rules, not the world's since we don't have a clue what we're doing when it comes to try to substitute our concepts of right and wrong for God's.

Friday, July 11, 2008

Caffeine is evil. Okay, that's a little harsh. Having grown up the son of two people who own a vending company, I can hardly pretend to be not be the child of caffeine peddlers. My shady history having been revealed I must admit I recently was shocked, perhaps more at my lack of awareness than anything else, that caffeine, technically speaking, is a drug. Now, drugs, to me at least, carry with them the association or marijuana, LSD, pills, booze, etc. The hard stuff. Then, when I think of caffeine, Coca Cola, Dr. Pepper, tea, puppy dogs and babies...it's hardly something to lump in with the hard stuff. I guess that association is part of what worries me the most. I, being a very stereotypical person will reach for the first can of soft drink to tickle my taste buds and wake me up all at the same time. Nonetheless, it became clear, doing this is a socially acceptable form of drug usage. It may be recreational drug usage, solely geared towards a jolt to my brain and lagging consciousness, but, it's drug usage nonetheless.

So, off I went trying to rethink how I live. Coke and drug usage. Okay, the double meaning there doesn't help. Dr. Pepper and drug usage. The two just don't seem to really mix. That reluctance to consider caffeinated soft drinks--and more dangerously, coffee, tea, pills, etc--as a negative worries me. Nothing has ever suggested soft drinks are bad except the sugary side effects. Chronic overstimulation of the CNS has a whole host of problems. I know wikipedia is just bad academic form...which makes me glad to not be an academic. Get past the basic history and pharmacology on the caffeine entry and read near the bottom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffeine I honestly don't see much redeeming value to the stuff.

And I confess my continued use of it. I guess that points to a larger, scarier issue. People today would rather ingest more of something that has harmful and deleterious effects, rather than live an alternative life style. Think, seriously for a moment. How many people do you know who don't use caffeine in some form or fashion? Think again, if the dangers of caffeine, though largely ignored in today's culture, were made known to someone, would they likely stop? Most people I know would rather keep on doing what they're doing. That's the rub. I, thinking myself, in theory at least, savvy enough to change my life when I come to grips with something harmful, I see the poison of caffeine and still use it. The propaganda of this drug is powerful and it's placement everywhere almost impossible to refuse, even if you try.

Kill you coffee pots people. Break the addiction. (Realize this is a little tongue and cheek if it's lost on you to this point, but, only about 5%.)

Thursday, June 26, 2008

I started a new blog to allow me to keep track of my computer related ramblings. The don't really seem to fit here any longer. It can be located at: http://learningpcs.blogspot.com Take a look if you're interested.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

While posting on an interesting topic I had confessed my own 2-year old temper in matters of spirituality. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know. I'm immature and will grow up in time. In the middle of my musings, I did, however, come to realize a little connection. For a long time, the idea of being and action had the wrong framework for me. In philosophy there is a long tradition of author's taking another thinker's work and tweaking it to make some ignored or, if not completely abused, at least, under-stated point. Sartre's "Being and nothingness" is probably the most famous, but, there are at least two other spin-offs I can think of immediately. Whitehead's "Process and being", Heidigger's "Being and Time" This whole school of philosophy deals with ontology. That's the ten-dollar word for the "study of being".

Enough of that rabbit trail. From the philosopher's war of being I gathered the basic idea that being is a passive act. Of course, if I reread these works, I would most likely realize I am projecting a personal perspective onto their works. It's been a while since I read any of these works, but, the lingering effect is that of passivity. When I came to start reading the Bible deeply, I saw verses like, "Be still and know that I am God" (Psalm 46:10) that probably reinforced a somewhat questionable idea of God's desire or intention for passivity. In the context of this verse, yes, passivity was at least until I saw what I saw tonight, a misrepresentation of what I believe God truly wants.

Now, my caveat here, ok, my outright disclaimer, is that I am not pretending like I do have the answer yet. Just the realization that I need to look in a different direction. So, that direction is... If we are to be passive, as my initial thought would have lent me to reason out, we would be incapable, by definition, of doing anything. Now, I know God can, and, does, more than we can ever comprehend. But, He doesn't and, by design, isn't supposed to do it all. Ergo, it can't be complete passivity.

Hmmm, what then? So, I can do it all; i.e., I'm not God. The converse is also true; I can't do nothing. Well, that makes it tricky doesn't it. I can't pout and grow at the same time. What does that leave for me to do? Act and be. Now that kind of tweaks my brain. It used to be an either/or scenario. I could act or be, not possibly both. As I showed above, that's illogical. Reconciling how to act and be is a totally new framework for thinking about life. "Being in God", with all its embedded, personal meanings and private significance, implied, in the past, total passivity. Acting carried with it the negative meaning of "selfish" activity. I have heard that we are to surrender to God so He can be in complete control of our lives.

Sounds great. The reality, however, differs from the rosy colored dream my hope had tied itself to. Perhaps, fantasy is a better word. Nonetheless, I am coming to see that God's prompting me, nudging me to rearrange my ideas a bit. Or a lot, as the case may be. He wants something infinitely more challenging than the "surrender" of passivity. God wants me, I believe God wants all of us, to surrender, not to give up and do nothing. To act but to act as He would have us act. In a sense, He wants us to do as He wants us to do. Imagine giving up yourself so completely that you do nothing, that is to say, you make no decisions, but, rather, carry out the decisions of another.

You see, it isn't inactivity of body he wants, it's inactivity of soul. He wants us to submit our will, not our lives. He needs our lives if we are to embody His will. We all are made to glorify God with our unique calling. And, only by living as we were created to live and be, can we fully allow God to carry out His plan. As I write this I am hearing in the back of my mind the nagging voice of the cynic, the critic and the theologically minded pointing out that we do not add to God. God is omnipotent, omniscient, etc. Yeah, He's all-everything. I see it another way. If we fully submit ourselves, we add nothing to God. Instead, we detract nothing from His plan if we do as much as we can. Yet, if we do not submit ourselves, we can prevent God's plan from being as full as it could be by preventing our portion of the plan from being carried out.

Coming back from that little rabbit trail, I sense that the war of free will is the heart of the matter here. If God could replace my will with His, what would my life be like? I believe that is what God longs for us to do. Now, I can hear others ask, why would someone do that? I completely believe God's plan is the perfect plan, the following of which brings the greatest possible fulfillment in one's life. Like the detraction comment above, our life is full to the degree to which we follow God's plan. Obviously, my spiritual pouting is slowing me down. God, of course, can use all things for good. That doesn't make my tantrum okay. Just a beautiful facet of grace I thank Him for about 50 times a day.

So, that leaves me with this blank slate called my life. I stand in this moment with a past, from which to draw experiences and a future, onto which I can choose to either continue to project myself...or, I can begin to let God show me what He wants me to see. To do this, I have to let God choose for me. I cannot not choose for myself. So, to make different choices, I have to rely on someone other than myself. (I guess I am invoking the idea of otherness here.) It really is, at its core, a paradox, an impossibility. It reveals an area where God must act. I, by the nature of the situation, cannot do it for myself. So, I turn here to another person. Of course, that person, can be human (as many people turn to) or non-human, angelic, demonic, etc. That being said, being and acting is a supernatural challenge. Being oneself, and an expression of another's will at the same time, is an eternal complexity I am only beginning to comprehend God wants me to fully embrace.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

He works in obvious, mysterious ways


One thing I love about God is how much he talks to us. No, not the "burning bush" kind of talking, or, the angels coming in the middle of the night. The quiet whispers reach me more often than the special effects kind of visit that most people think of when considering God's interaction in their lives.

In the past month our church has been giving an awesome series of sermons on happiness. To be precise, the pursuit of happiness. I've blogged on this before, but, there have been some redefinitions and quite a few ahas as a result of the series. I want to devote an entire post to that all on its own. The main thing here is that unhappiness has been a companion of mine for some time. Not one I welcome, but, rather, seem to be burdened with on a rather permanent basis.

At the core of my unhappiness is I have come to sense that the path God has me on is not the want I want to be on. Indeed, a few months ago I had to accept the realization that I am an envious Christian. Not good. Amy and I used to go to the same church and we pursued a path down the road of prophetic ministry. Only, she actually got to go down that road while I was stopped and sent a different direction. I hold it not against her in any way. Frustration has been marking my every turn. I want, so badly, to be involved in the kind of things she does. However, I find, instead of grounding myself in a church where revelatory gift is the norm, it is the exception. Instead of getting more involved in what I sense my calling is, I grow bitter about struggling to survive my daily life. Instead of...well, you get the idea. Happiness has not been on my tongue. It has been on my heart however. I long for the joy that comes from not only accepting my position in life, but, praising God, from the depths of my being, for the blessing he has poured out upon me and my family.

So, here I stand. Looking around, wondering where to go. What to do. I am in a job that is good, but, I long for more. I am trying to find ways to help the company grow and become more of what I think I am supposed to be at the same time. Yet, even in this scenario God has hidden surprises for me on an almost daily basis. I work with a couple of guys who are all very sharp at what the do. While sitting at lunch with them I realized, I am very much in what I have been prepared to do! My grandfather was basically a network engineer at Bell South for 35 years. He was a technical wizard in all respects. Since I was a kid I never wanted to go down that road because technology reminded me of business and I hated business. I always wanted to be an artist, a musician, an athlete. Anything but a technologist or a business person. (And, guess what, I work in a technology business.)

At any rate, it became clear that, in spite of my unwillingness to receive the tremendous heritage my grandfather and my father have accumulated in the type of field I am in, I was among people that they would probably have been around. In a way, even though I tried not to end up becoming like them, I am. I am surrounded by people who are gifted with technology. It was a little light bulb to know that I was in a place where I would naturally fit even though I didn't plan or want it. God had led me where I probably should have been all along.

This little realization is one of those moments that stokes the very small flame of hope in my heart. I have come to realize that hope, the kind of hope that I saw and desired in almost every one else at the prophetic arena, typically has to be hyped up. People live in this frenzied "spiritual" state. It's a sort of hyper-real sense of God that is real, but, is extremely hard to cultivate in "normal" life. In a sense, that's why people who truly pursue that type of ministry become unlike the rest of us. At any rate, hearing God say, quietly in the midst of my grumbling, "You're where you're supposed to be and where you're supposed to have been all along" is humbling.

So, I have this one little theme going on in my spirit. A lightly rousing melody of hope. That was lunch. This morning, I have another little nudge. Many years ago I went to school in Memphis and they had a series of organizations that focused on social justice. Real activist types. While there I had an acquaintance who was odd. Gifted in many strange ways. At 18 a local musician. A writer. Counter cultural. He ended up getting a degree in math (my longed for degree). He had the acclaim of professors in spite of his not seeking it. I looked at him, 10 years later, and had a sense of envy.

That was it, envy. I still struggle with desire for things I don't have. Envy. I see this guy and see so much of what I wanted. Or think I wanted. Here I am, struggling to get by, struggling to find identity, struggling to keep my head above water. And I see this guy's picture, covered in tattoos, still walking down his road, calling his own shots, success in his wake. I, nobody, no where. Then, I see amidst my own blinding cloud of temporarily self-absorbed distraction, a wonderful life, my life. The fundamental problem is simple: how to want what I have, not what I don't have. Isn't that always it? We want something we don't have because we think it will bring us happiness. We think the grass on the other side of the fence is what will make us complete, what will make us happy.

But, the green grass theory only goes so far. It doesn't really propose an end. It just proposes another step in the process. Many people argue with Christians when they assert there is a beginning point, the unmoved mover. They don't want to have to accept this type of proposition because it forces them to ask, "Well, what is that?" This naturally leads to the issue of God. If you get people looking at now, at the future, it's a lot easier to get them to lose focus. People stuck in the middle of the fire cope with life. They don't embrace it. They don't grasp the moments they are being given. Instead they try to put themselves somewhere else, somewhere better than where they are then.

By pursing things, futures, better, green grasses, people never set a goal in mind. They find a means to happiness, the temporary fix, as being an end in and of itself, when God should be the end. Even in the moment, God should be the end, the absolute reference point by which we gauge our moors as well as our mores. Happiness, as Jesus shows us in the Beatitudes, doesn't come from getting high on the next best thing. I am beginning to suspect there is so much more to the blessedness we derive from being obedient it's scary. I see the inevitable and I just keep thinking, quietly, unspoken, even to my mind, how long can I put off the inevitable?

God waits for us to truly give Him the okay before we can be ready for Him to come to us. By chasing happiness, we all too often, like children trying to catch butterflies, are never where God can meet us. We have hopped up, run away and not given Him enough time to meet us where we were supposed to be when He asked us to wait. I've heard so many times that we are often the reason we don't progress in God more than we do. I know when I make decisions, almost every little decision to ignore, despise, reject, begrudge God. And, I can't even imagine how He still loves me in my rebellious state.

I pray God can give me the happiness he has in store, provided I am willing to let Him give it to me. I pray I let Him give it to me. I guess part of the mystery is how He can speak to us and yet we choose not to hear him, to turn a deaf ear. There is typically no mystery in God if we allow Him to speak; if we are honest with what He tells us and don't cover it up in smoke, mirrors and lies. It is in us that the mystery lies, why we choose not to live the way God's called us to. The mystery of living with sin and a God who loves us anyway. How can we reconcile this?

Saturday, June 07, 2008

Anyone ever hate long drug commercials? I actually started timing them to see how much air time they are buying. The longest one I recently saw was a Lunesta piece: 2:41. Seriously, a commercial that lasts 2 minutes 41 seconds! How insane. It's total brainwashing. Subliminal is so 1940's.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Unimpressed with the IRS


I am not prone to political commentary, but, after getting my second notification from the IRS, I am deeply disappointed in how the Tax Stimulus was handled. Sure, I'm happy I get some money. It's much needed. But, as of 2007, the US population was 301,139,947. Of course, it's grown since then, but, working with those numbers, and the average US household size being 2.61, as of 2006, that averages out to about 115,379,290 households in the US. Assuming printing, mailing costs and overhead for the IRS to mail these notification, as a country we spent, between the two mailings, $115,379,290.04 to inform ourselves of something everyone already knew as a result of mass media. So, why did we spent $115 million dollars to do something that had already been done? That's just bad business and worse governing.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Divine nerves


Years ago I had read some oriental literature discussing an idea relating the cosmological and the quantum. "As above, so below", the saying goes. With this in mind a possible connection between urban growth patterns and nerve cell structures came to mind. Below are two images, a nerve bundle and a high level overview of a city.





Nerve tissue





Urban sprawl

Notice how the road patterns resemble the random directions of nerve tissue. Obviously, the analogy only goes so far. Urban sprawl is essentially a two dimensional pattern, even though geography allows some 3 dimensionality. Nerve tissue is a 3 dimensional form. Nonetheless, I began to wonder about this pattern, centralized, outwardly expanding natural patterns. In addition to the relationship between nerves and urban sprawl were trees, rivers, fractal patterns, glacial and ice movements. These all had the same kind of branching physical structures. In reality, these are more self-similar than the urban development-nerve pattern. That being said, this pattern repeats so much, I just found it fascinating and keep noticing how it keeps reappearing across a wide range of scales, from the cellular to the geographical.

So, with the pattern being noted, I began to wonder if, assuming the scale of space and time are similar, nervous tissue is microscopic and develops very quickly. Likewise, the urban sprawl patterns would grow over time very slowly in proportion to the massive scale of cities. In the two pictures shown above, a nerve bundle is about 100 micrometers. A city, such as New York, is roughly 100 kilometers across. So, the size relationship is 1 to 100000000000. So, if that is the case, the amount of time it takes for full urban development should be proportional to the length of time it takes for nerves to form. Still looking for that number.

Just some interesting observations...

Sunday, May 11, 2008

"Everything is permissible"—but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible"—but not everything is constructive. -- Paul

When I was growing up my dad instilled in me a great sense of hope. Until a few years ago, an untested sense of hope. As I grew up I was not a very athletic kid, but, I loved activity. When I got into 8th grade I started running cross country at a new school just to do something I was terrible. Over the years I got better, even got a small scholarship to go to school in Tennessee. Throughout college I was obsessed with the sport and focused on it to the utter demise of my academic potential. I did manage to graduate, but, obsessed as a I was, merely saw graduation as the opportunity to train unhindered by school. This went on for a few years. In 2002, I was running 110 miles a week hoping I would make some Michael Jordan-like breakthrough, becoming something I had longed to be for years.

It never happened. I realized, in this pursuit, it was something that would take away from a more important decision in my life: marriage. I saw a choice, love my dreams or love my wife. There was only one choice: I chose to love my wife. Pursuing my dream would have been selfish and cost me the greatest person I have ever met. I got married that summer and came to realize, or rather, accept, that I was not as gifted as I hoped. Around that time my dad, in one of our conversations, said, "It's okay to pursue your dreams until you realize they are only dreams." For me, this was a major challenge. I had truly believed that anything was possible. In this case, if I ran enough, if I did the right things, if I was perfect in my execution, if I exerted enough will, I could become what I dreamed of being. I had completely believed, "anything is possible". Running was the grounds upon which I tested this belief and came up realizing it was not true. Or, at least, not the way I thought.

A few weeks ago while driving to work, I realized as I reflected on one of our pastor's sermons that is not quite true. Indeed, all things are permissible. It is in the Bible. However, just because, as Paul said, something is permissible, does not necessarily mean it is for the best. The sermon discussed a woman who had lost her sight. To get into the church, she had to have someone assist her.

He had taken this actual experience to illustrate a larger point. Paul wrote of the church as a body. When a person is acting in a role that is not what they are intended to perform, other members of the body have to compensate for this person not doing what they are intended to do. He remarked that it's amazing how one person being unable (or, I would add to extend this notion, unwilling) to do what they are supposed to requires two bodies. This type of scenario detracts from God's ability to demonstrate his love and power because people are using their gifts the wrong way and detracting from God's glory for their own pursuits.

With my running, I believe, and, after reflection, still see that I probably could achieve my goals of being a world class athlete. However, the amount of time, energy and effort required to accomplish this would be a horrible waste of time and a gross misplacement of focus. I would have to have inordinate resources, financial, social, mental and emotional, to pursue this. That's not something, as I now sense Paul was hinting at, I see making a lot of sense.

With God, all things indeed are permissible. But, I am now inclined to ask, "Is this beneficial?" "Does this help me love more?" "Does this choice promote me or others?" It is the age old question of putting yourself or others first. We were given free will. Using it for good, however, comes at a cost. I learned that making dreams come true makes for poor goodness.
While discussing giftedness with someone recently an argument I had never foreseen came up. The other person had detached themselves from a religious background and formed a very anti-religious sentiment throughout their life. In an effort to convince me of the virtue of this choice they said that not using their gifts, referring to mental abilities, would be not living up to God's potential. At the time I didn't see it, but, this is the exact kind of thing Paul was talking about in 1 Corinthians 13. He clearly says,
If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.

This particular person would have nothing. In fact, I look at their life and have deep pity, a certain sadness. The only focus for this person is their own giftedness. Sadly, they don't even realize the shallow "depth" of their point of view. Never do they ask, "What is the gift for?" Only, "how can I use it to the best of my abilities?" Wrong focus, wrong result.

In particular, "intellectuals" fall into the category of person who will resort to this argument that they have something and that something should be their focal point. In reality, love is the intended focus, and all gifts are meant to enhance our ability to love. Taking the focus off the gift, off the self, and looking at the results, at the love generated (or, as in this case, never developed), I think this type of false thinking can be uprooted.

Monday, April 21, 2008

A while back I came across some information regarding the Hebraic calendar. To scholars of Hebrew culture, the lunar calendar is nothing new. In fact, is it a basic method of measuring time. Indeed, the small light, as Moses described it in Genesis, has been a major demarcation factor since the beginning of time. Having come up in a Western culture, that is to say, as a member who has been influenced by the Greeks and Romans, the lunar calendar is as wrong as it could be. Yet, I find something interesting about that fact that, in a situation where a culture has 50/50 odds on picking the right method for calculating time, Western culture opted for the one opposite that of the Hebraic culture. Now, the fact that our culture, one renowned for being anti-Christian, would be at odds with such a simple choice is not surprising. What I find surprising, however, is the fact that people are ignorant of the history behind the solar calendar. In Greek culture, Helios was the sun god. The fact that the calendar, the solar calendar that is, focuses the entire Western culture on a sense of time and the passage of day to night that could stem from a form of sun worship just strikes me as quite ironic. Yet, to think of working on a lunar calendar, or, to put it another way, based on a heavenly body that is not the sun, seems wrong. That prejudice is undoubtedly the result of having grown up only knowing the sun and day as the center of our system for measuring time. I've posted before about the significance of Friday nights (the beginning of the Sabbath day in Judaism) as being the most raucous of the American culture. It lines up quite nicely with the fact that a demonic form of cosmology would pin even the most basic type of norm, "Friday night fun", against a practice and form of viewing time that honors the God of the Bible. I guess it just amazes me that I've never seen a church point this out or realize it and act on this. I've seen churches that pose the question, and implement the practice, of having church on Saturday, but, as far as days beginning at dusk, that I have yet to see. We would literally have to flip our notion of day and night around... Only God would want to turn our world upside down that much, but, quite rightly.

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Random thoughts by Will

Two thoughts I had recently, my typical fare:

1) If you could meet yourself, today, the same age, same person, just another body, what would you talk about?

2) If angels are not physical beings, can you be in the same physical space as an angel or do the laws of physics apply to spiritual beings?

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Liam has a habit of occasionally waking up and screaming like a caged beast if we try to put him back to bed. We are considering the possibility this might coincide with a heightened sensitivity to things spiritual seeing as tonight is a full moon. And, just for posterity, it's a green light night.

Lunar phases

Saturday, March 01, 2008

Last week's lunar eclipse reminded me of something I used to consider often. I explred astrology partly because I wanted to see what, if any, basis is real and partly because I know for everything counterfeit their is something real God created which the enemy is trying to replicate. Anyhow, I noticed there was a lot of dream activity in our house. I had something like 6 dreams the night before the eclipse. But, on a more regular basis, where full lunar eclipses aren't happening, there are forces exerted by the lunar cycles we have overlooked in our "scientific" Westernized worldview.

The Hebraic world worked on the lunar cycles. It still does. Indeed, their calendar is lunar whereas ours is based on the solar calendar. That being true, I wonder why we, as Christians in our scientific worldview, don't ditch the science. God hasn't changed his mind about the way the universe ran since Jesus' day. Many modern day Christians have simply never been shown that the solar model of time is not the real first-century model Christ and the apostles used. I just wonder, what are we missing because we are not paying attention to this? What sort of signs are being ignored because we have the wrong focal point?

The basic issues are well-known. High and low tide are directly related to lunar movements. Dream cycles work in conjunction with lunar patterns, as do planting and harvesting patterns. What else have I just not noticed. Even though it is anecdotal, as far as I know, many hospitals see increased frequency of activity around full moons as well as, though there's no real standard for weirdness, an increase in the bizarre factor around those times as well. In other words, there are lots of obvious indicators the lunar cycle is something that is real and its effects are powerful, albeit a discounted element of the forces being exerted on people.

On another note, I know that the "planetary" influences in astrology are more about the "spirits" or the "energies" of the planets than about astronomical or physical influences. Nonetheless, I often wonder, speaking in terms of macrocosmic patterns and gravitational influences, what sort of patterns can be attributed to the constantly changing interactions of planets upon each other. Most people don't follow the astronomical positioning of different planetary cycles enough to try and track the different patterns that might reveal themselves. Again, I often wonder what we're missing as a result.

Certainly, our call as Christians is primarily theocentric, first and foremost, but, anthropocentric next. We are to focus on the Kingdom of God and upon people. Beyond that, Christians are not really directed to pay too much attention to these Old Testament types of realities. In spite of this, I suspect there are dimensions of the spiritual walk of Christians that could benefit from being more aware of the heavens above. Perhaps God will make it a bit more clear to me what these influences are supposed to be and how they matter in our everyday lives.

Monday, February 25, 2008

Ruminations on princess toothpaste



My girls have princess toothpaste to help them get used to using adult toothpaste. Since we are remodeling and I couldn't find ours anywhere I used the pink goop. While I was brushing my teeth and looking around I noticed three princesses (we have princesses everyone) on the toothpaste tube. Around them were all sorts of glimmers of light and sparkles. Seeing as the toothpaste was named "Bubble gum magic", it made me think of Page's most requested movie, Cindarella. Those sparkling likes and magic are everywhere. Now, this isn't a magic is evil and we should ban kids from seeing it type thread. Rather, I had the notion come to me that, while fantasy is a dimension kids in particular find more meaningful than adults, the spiritual experiences I have been having and reading more about, in particlar orbs, lights, heavenly hosts, etc, are things kids might inherently be drawn to because of increased sensitivity. Kids are typically far more spiritually aware than adults and it makes sense that kids would see this "magic"--translated into this prophetic Chrsitianese as orbs, lights, angels, etc.--as a part of every day life. In other words, kids relate to these movies moreso than anything else because it is how they really experience things. We often dismiss their fondness for these movies as youthful fantasy and regard it as nothing more. My "bubble gum magic" moment was the realization that this "magic" kids see is probably something real, something signficant and something not to be dismissed. I want to talk to the girls and see if I can ferret out some confirmation of this insight, but, I think He showed me something with why "princesses" are so enamored with their movies and all that is royal.

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Curious TV


The past few weeks Kerri and I have been watching, when we have time, the new ABC show "Eli Stone". We both think the show was a concept shelved a while back, pulled out while the writer's strike waged on. However, it is interesting that the prophetic, even though it is distorted rather liberally, has risen to the level of national attention, or at least consciousness. Sure, there are some seriously frightening implications people might draw about the prophetic from watching this show. Nonetheless, the fact that a major broadcasting network put a show whose main subject matter is how a prophetic person would operate in today's society seems like a remarkably strong move. Perhaps the whole strike was run just so this show could air. I sincerely doubt it, but, He has been known to do stranger things.

When all's said and done, I think it will be phased out at the end of the season. If it lasts two, I'd be shocked. One big question we have is whether the show's writers will dabble in those ever-dangerous waters of underlining the good versus evil theme. A few years ago a show we both watched with increasing interest, "Joan of Arcadia", began get progressively closer to making a thematic statement in line with the Christian message. When they introduced the character of satan, the show abruptly ended a few weeks later. It's seems things were getting a little too real and people starting barking. Were Eli to start tapping into this type of theme, it would definitely get yanked. We're hoping, as intentionally non-religious yet spiritual as the show is, it won't get canned just yet so God can do whatever it is he needs to do with this one.

Watching with eager curiosity to see what happens...

Thursday, February 21, 2008










The innocent victim.
The guilty party.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

While driving a few days ago I had a nice little realization. As I passed and accident I had to physically force myself not to look. It was the strangest thing. Then, it dawned on me that many of the habits we fall into becomes forceful. The phrase, force of habit, it took on a new dimension. Having to literally force myself to not look. It was amazing to think, so many of the walls we construct are just a result of choices repeated over time. After enough repetitions, they become so engrained they seem real. It was as if a force was drawing me to look at that accident. Like someone was physically turning my head.

Then, I thought about the energy that could be freed by breaking these bonds...these habits. Being bound by habit prevents us from a great many things. A freedom found by the deliberate resistance to imaginary forces, powers. How much of our lives do we live simply obeying these forces? I didn't know I was following a habit. Only by a brief glimpse of did I realize I could turn my head, not look, start making new, different choices. I want to start applying this to my life, start looking at larger aspects, deeper habits, start seeing the forces for what they are and make new decisions. I am curious to see how unraveling these forces could transform my life. It is interesting to say the least.
You ever seen those commercials where the beagle has it's skin pulled back, wind blowing full tilt, slobber flying backwards? That's my family right now. We're busy beyond definition. Seems like this promotion God's got us absorbing than we think (or seem to think) we are able to handle without screaming, alcohol or some combination of both! Anyhow, a new car, new job, new PC (my old one died), renovations and the hope to move in the next 3-4 months. Lots on our plates. But, it seems like things will be good when we're all done. We've got some pictures on Kerri's site. As we make progress I'll post some just to show what in the world is going on.

Monday, January 28, 2008

We are reading Ephesians for our community group. While recapping 2:8-10 I noticed a new way to think about the concept that salvation can be achieved by works, but by faith alone. Never before had I seen a connection between the process of salvation-sanctification-glorification and works. Finally, it became, for me, at least, that works do have a place, as James 2 suggests, but, in the proper context, works have no value.

Salvation is received by faith and faith alone. We cannot earn salvation through acts of righteousness. The path to salvation has but on door and that is through faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and savior. No work can be involved in receiving this gift of grace. Now, back to that three part process: salvation-sanctifiation-glorification. Salvation is spiritual birth, a singular event with eternal and life-long consequences. Sanctification, however, is a much more expansive, enduring state, covering everything that occurs between birth and transcendence into the heavenly realms.

Though works have no part in that first stage of the process, works are the necessary, external evidence of one's faith in the second part of the process, sanctification. As James notes, "faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead." If you look at the two scriptures without the three-part theological perspective I hinted at, they do not reconcile. How can works be valueless and necessary at the same time? They can't. Each truth has its place in the proper perspective and do not contradict or invalidate the other. For me, it took a while to realize this process was the perspective that cleared the confusion up on this matter.

Praise God.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

China (again)

While considering how to deal with the issue of praying against an entire national assault it came to mind that it would really fall under the category of an Ephesians 6:13 type prayer. Praying against an entire national intent is hardly a wise idea. That pretty directly aligns with trying to individually overthow a high level spirit that stands over 1/6th of the earth's population. So, that leaves me with the question. If I have revelation that an assault of that scale and of that nature is happening against our country, how do I pray for it? How do I begin trying raise up my spirit in a way that would stop this gap? Lord, raise up prayers of intercession, prayers or protection for our country. May the praise of American people screaming your name with power, with passion and with hope be the shield raised to protect our country. Lord, be our shield.
Random thoughts:

Genius (again). This one keeps coming up because I think of the saints as spiritual geniuses. That being said, I keep seeing this image of geniuses as being tuned into a things that are always there, things we normally dismiss or are too engrossed in our normal lives to perceive. They have a higher sensitivity to these things. Take Elijah for instance. The passage where the servant goes out and sees the armies surrounding them. Elijah perceived something that was there while the servant didn't. Elijah did not change the circumstances for the servant to see. he did not make the Lord's army come. He merely gave the servant eyes to see (allowed him to possess higher sensitivity). Fasting has really been on my mind ever since I heard John Paul talk last August. One side effect of fasting is it increase one's sensitivity in all areas. I've never done any significant fasting and I am praying for people to support me in this effort through prayer, but I truly believe that fasting will begin to help me get in touch with this higher order of sensitivity.

Another variation on that theme, something that popped into my mind as I considered what I wrote about above, was the concept of memory. Many geniuses have memories that far surpass what normal people can even think of. I can't recall his name, but a mathematician who worked on the Manhattan project was tested in his 20's by being given phone books. He read them and memorized entire phone books and could recite sections of them. Some 30 or 40 years later he was able to perform the same feat without having looked at them ever again. In a way, this is superhuman. There are countless stories of this kind of astounding recollection, but, what I saw was that most people inefficiently use their memories. Most people are not truly engrossed enough in the things they are experiencing to truly recollect things in this manner. Sure, there are some abilities, not matter how much normal people practice, train and develop their memories, they will never possess or even come close to. That's why the people who have those rare gifts are one in a billion. Once in a lifetime type minds. Nonetheless, if people truly engaged themselves more completely in the life they are living instead of a conversation they had or hope to have, their moods, their obsessions, their distractions, then, memory, or the energy that could be channeled into more fully remembering things, could be of a different order. There's something about people not tuning in, being here now that I see as being a major impediment to the full use of their ability to remember things.

Good books

A few months ago our church was getting rid of its library in preparation for our upcoming move as well as a garage sale to try and raise funds for the new children's playground. Among the books I found two that are really speaking to me: Warren Wiersbe's Be Mature, about James, and a compilation called Disciplines for the Inner Life by Bob and Michael Benson. Wiersbe's book takes a no non-sense, meaty look at the letter. I have yet to see what other titles he's done, but, I love his style and writing. Perhaps I am just at a place where meaty is satisfying in ways I have never been able to appreciate until now. Nonetheless, a terrific resource. The Benson and Benson book, however, is a much larger object for me. It is a 52-chapter (one year) book discussing several areas of the spiritual life. The writing is a collection of various authors, church fathers etc. It seems to be filling my void for good writing (I miss Kierkegaard) and meaningful reflection (did I say I missed Kierkegaard). Anyway, they've been speaking to me of late and are some good books. I recommend checking them out...or, if you live near me, borrowing them.

Tuesday, January 01, 2008

A comment was posted the other day that I wanted to which I wanted to reply. After Kerri and I had a few days to discuss it I realized the response deserved its own post.

The comment was, "As I feel I do take an active role in having peace from God, I wonder how do you apply this within discernment?!?!?! I know what my spiritual gift is, but I am having a difficult time in knowing how to apply it!"

In response to the blogger, I don't mean to sound condescending with my response. If you have already considering what I am about to write, understand it's hard to know what people know and don't know in this medium. So, if I am recovering your tracks, forgive me.

In the end, I see two ways of considering the gift of discernment.

Fruit of the Spirit confirm one's walk

Looking at the fruit of the Spirit, it appears the characteristics outlined in the Galatians passage are not so much gifts since they are available to all Christians. These traits--love, joy, peace, patience, etc--do more to confirm a Christian is walking with the Holy Spirit than anything else. The presence of these gifts merely show one is truly living a holy life.

Spiritual gifts on the other hand can be possessed by people who are not in a holy, vibrant relationship with God. Jesus himself says there will come a time when some arrive in heaven to be judged and Christ himself will reject them even though the walked in power. Christ would more liekly not reject one whose life was marked by the demonstrative presence of the fruit of the Spirit.

Spiritual gifts edify the Body of Christ

All the lists of spiritual gifts I have ever seen do not include anything about any of the fruits as belonging on that list. Discernment, noted in 1 Corinthians 12:10, does fall into this list. When Paul talks about gifts in general he does mention that "to each one the manifestation of the Spirit is given for the common good." (1 Cor 12:7) Prior to that he outlines, what I have seen scholoars categorize, one of the the three persons of the Godhead under whose authority each gift belongs.

Discernment falls into the area of the service gifts. A good reference article I find informative is John MacArthur's The Permanent Edifying Gifts -- The Serving Gifts: Mercy, Faith, and Discernment. From this it seems reasonable to infer that serving is the basis for developing the gift of discernment. As the 12:10 verse suggests, all spiritual gifts, including discernment, are meant to edify the Church as a whole.

To me, discernment ties in very closely with the revelatory gifts and the intertwined workings of apostles and prophets. Of course, the issue of what one believes on these matters determines how applicable discernment is in today's church, but, recognizing truth from falsehood is the essence of discernment. If this recognition has no "next step", I see it as being dead in today's church. In other words, if falsehood is recognized but there is no authoritative response to this falsehood, what good is the gift of discernment? Additionally, discernment allows for powerful intercession through words of knowledge and revelation as well as an added dimension no other gift can mimic.

I know this may sound crazy, but, Googling gift of discernment offers some interesting starting points. One I liked about the true gift says,

I'm guessing that you're talking about the spiritual gift of discernment (a rare thing) rather than the Spirit-led process of day-to-day discernment. A lot of people really believe that they or their pastor or a friend have been given a special gift for discerning the Godliness of the spirit of something or someone. Very few have shown this gift when they try to put it to work. It tends to break down into an internal political thing. Gift-discernment is often sent by the Spirit for situations rather than full-time, and works like a strong intuition (but more Spiritually focused, like a laser). When it's there, it's to be used, like other gifts, to build others up, and it's always to be used in a very Christ-like manner (but you have to read the Gospels a lot to catch what that is).

Gifts are a mystery, to be lived rather than understood.


Source: http://www.spirithome.com/letters5.html

Again, I want to be clear discernment is not one of my giftings, but, a close relationship with the Spirit is key. Remembering that the edification of the Church is key as it keeps on humble and constructive in the use of this gift, like all others. And, continued development of one's character over one's gift is a surefire way to built any gift, regardless of the existing measure of a gift.

These are my first thoughts on the matter.

Lastly, an article from Paul Keith Davis, on of the few people I have actually heard and know something about. http://www.charismamag.com/display.php?id=8564